The global mobile worker population exceeded a billion people in 2010, according to a recent report from VDC Research. That growth, research director David Krebs wrote at the time, reflects \u00e2\u20ac\u0153the increasingly flexible, distributed and dynamic workflows occurring in virtually every industry sector.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
But those mobile workers are surprisingly ill-equipped.<\/p>\n
According to VDC, the level of penetration of enterprise mobility solutions<\/a> among mobile workers is between 5 percent and 15 percent, depending on the regional market.<\/p>\n \u00e2\u20ac\u0153This represents an immense opportunity for enterprises (when considering the potential productivity improvements associated with enterprise mobility solutions) and enterprise mobility solution providers,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Krebs wrote.<\/p>\n If you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re considering taking advantage of that opportunity, however, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s crucial to take a step-by-step approach.<\/p>\n Step one is simply to determine whether or not it makes sense to switch from a legacy paper-based system to a mobile solution. In most cases, that comes down to assessing and understanding the specific needs of your workers.<\/p>\n In doing so, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s crucial to ensure that you can see the forest for the trees.<\/p>\n One mistake many enterprises make is to try to solve just one\u00c2\u00a0problem, or provide one piece of functionality, without looking at the big picture \u00e2\u20ac\u201c say, providing workers with GPS.<\/p>\n According to a recent study by McKinsey & Company, 90 percent of corporate investment in GPS is wasted \u00e2\u20ac\u201c many companies simply provide employees with the navigational aid without examining how it fits into the worker\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s overall task-by-task process.<\/p>\n In a case like that, it may actually be more cost-effective to stick with a paper-based process. If you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re deploying a mobile solution without making sure that your employees can actually benefit from it in a tangible way, that could just be money thrown away.<\/p>\n Instead, take the time to map out a day in the life of one of your employees, and look for the key tasks \u00e2\u20ac\u201c and combinations of tasks \u00e2\u20ac\u201c that provide challenges in terms of time and efficiency.<\/p>\n You might find, for example, that combining inventory management<\/a> with GPS tracking could enable you both to dispatch drivers and to track the location of all inventory in real time. By doing so, you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re optimizing several processes, rather than just giving drivers access to a map of their destination.<\/p>\n So instead of providing technology and then figuring out where it fits, do the reverse \u00e2\u20ac\u201c understand what your employees are doing on a task-by-task basis and what problems or challenges they face, then determine the best technology solution to those problems.<\/p>\n If you do so, the benefits can be enormous, covering a wide variety of functionality:<\/p>\n According to a recent Aberdeen Group report, organizations that provide their field service teams with the knowledge, information and tools to deliver, meet and beat customer expectations are able to retain 93 percent of their customers, compared to a 77 percent retention rate for all others, and exhibit a 74 percent level of workforce\u00c2\u00a0utilization in contrast to 60 percent for all others.<\/p>\n Still, if you look at your employees\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 needs and the potential sources of improvement and decide that automating your field force is the right way to go, there are several other challenges to consider.<\/p>\n\n
\n<\/strong>An office equipment servicing company recently met with Honeywell Scanning & Mobility to discuss the possibility of switching from a paper-based system to rugged devices. The company has more than $2 million worth of equipment out on trucks at any given time, but because the on-truck inventory is managed with paper, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s impossible to know where that equipment is at all times. Using mobile devices<\/a> instead, the company can track all equipment in real time.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n<\/strong>Rugged devices can also assist that company\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s employees in several other ways. Instead of having to pick up a thick paper manual that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s taking up room on the passenger seat of his truck, a field worker can pull up that manual on a mobile device, then enter a search term to find the information he or she needs instantly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n<\/strong>With a USB diagnostic port, a field service worker can simply plug into a piece of equipment, and that equipment can self-diagnose any issues. No paper process can match that for efficiency, accuracy, or ease of use.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n<\/strong>Employees\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 schedules and work\u00c2\u00a0assignments can be managed efficiently using mobile devices. The right application and the right devices can eliminate any need for employees to call into a dispatch center to check, change or update their schedules.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n<\/strong>Several aspects of the customer service experience can be greatly improved by being able to accept payments in real time using a mobile device, providing line-busting, efficiency enhancements, and improved accuracy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n<\/strong>This may well be the most compelling benefit of all \u00e2\u20ac\u201c a 2008 study published in the journal \u00e2\u20ac\u0153BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\u00e2\u20ac\u009d found that it took almost 1.5 times longer to gather research data on paper than it took to do so on a PDA. More importantly, gathering data on paper, the study found, resulted in eight times as many errors as doing so on a PDA. Similarly, in a 2008 study published in the journal \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Annals of Family Medicine,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d 35 percent of paper forms were found to have errors of omission, while only 3 percent of forms gathered electronically did.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n